MORE
FY05 Evaluations Home
Programs' Original FY05 PART Worksheets
PART Section One: Program Purpose and Design
PART Section Two: Strategic Program Planning
PART Section Three: Program Management
PART Section Four: Program Results
FY04 Evaluations

Section Three:
Program Management

Section Three of the Program Assessment Rating Tool examines the role of Program Management in improving overall results. By being accountable for the goals and measures in Section Two, the PART focuses on the accountability and transparency of our front-line managers in meeting those goals. This section therefore addresses the relationship of effectively managing by our performance-oriented plans.

To receive a score of "Effective" in the Program Management section, it is important that the agency collect performance data-both for the program and for contractors. More importantly, the collection of performance data allows managers to set ambitious yet meaningful, performance targets for the program. This section reinforces the Administration's insistence that managers be held accountable for performance standards, results, and costs.

SAMPLE QUESTION:
Are federal managers and program partners held accountable for performance?

ELEMENTS OF A "YES" ANSWER:
Identify managers who are responsible for achieving program results and establish performance standards for them; require partners to achieve specific performance standards

Section Results
Listed Alphabetically by Agency/Program Name 
Ranked by Section Score 

 

Home The Performance Institute Results of the PART FY05 Evaluations FY05 Evaluations The President's FY05 Budget Ask the Experts OMB Guidance The Logic Model Approach to Performance Management PART and Performance-Based Budgeting Events Receive Updates on Performance Budgeting About TransparentGovernment.org