This web site is dedicated to increasing the transparency
of government at all levels: federal, state and local. What is government
transparency and why should taxpayers demand it? A government is
transparent when it reports its results and accomplishments back to the
people who "own" it: the taxpayers. Transparency
requires government to measure its performance, report on success and
failure, and demonstrate a clear and compelling case for continuing to
fund specific programs. Simply put, government programs should only
receive taxpayer dollars when they demonstrate clear results.
This website designed to benefit the ordinary taxpayer wanting information
on what they are getting for their tax dollars, as well as government
managers wanting to implement the principles of transparency,
accountability and performance in their individual
programs to demonstrate their worth to the taxpayer.
Help us advance government transparency by reviewing the resources on
this site and adding additional content on the performance of government.
This
is a copy of the OMB Program Assesment Rating Tool. Tou can either
print out this page and fill in the scores manually or click
here
for a self-scoring Microsoft Excel file.
OMB Program
Assessment Rating Tool (PART)
Direct Federal
Programs
Name
of Program:
Section
I: Program Purpose/Relevance/Federal Role
Questions
Ans.
Explanation
(Required)
Evidence/Data
(if available)
RMO Weighting
Weighted Score
1
Is the program
purpose clear?
20%
2
Does the program
address a specific problem, interest or need?
20%
3
Is the Federal
role critical?
20%
4
Does the program
make a significant, unique contribution to solving the problem?
20%
5
Does the program
use the most efficient/effective mechanism to accomplish its
goals?
20%
Total
Section Score
Section
II: Strategic Planning
Questions
Ans.
Explanation
(Required)
Evidence/Data
(if available)
RMO Weighting
Weighted Score
1
Does the program
have a limited number of specific, ambitious long-term performance
goals that focus on outcomes and meaningfully reflect the
purpose of the program?
20%
2
Does the program
have a limited number of annual performance goals that demonstrate
progress toward achieving the long-term goals?
20%
3
Do all program
partners (grantees, sub-grantees, contractors, etc.) commit
to and report on performance that relates to and supports
the output and outcome goals of the program?
20%
4
Is a comprehensive,
independent, quality evaluation of the program conducted on
a regular basis?
20%
5
Is the program
budget aligned with the program goals in such a way that the
impact of funding, policy, and legislative changes on performance
is readily known?
20%
Total
Section Score
Section
III: Program Management
Questions
Ans.
Explanation
(Required)
Evidence/Data
(if available)
RMO Weighting
Weighted Score
1
Does the agency
regularly collect timely and credible performance information
and use it to manage the program?
15%
2
Are performance
measurements used to increase accountability?
15%
3
Are all funds
(Federal and partners’) obligated in a timely manner?
15%
4
Are all funds
(Federal and partners’) spent for the intended purpose?
15%
5
Does the agency
estimate and budget for the full annual costs of operating
the program (including all administrative costs and allocated
overhead)?
10%
6
Are the administrative
costs reasonable?
10%
7
Does agency use
cost comparisons and competitive sourcing for this program
to achieve cost-effectiveness and when special expertise is
needed?
10%
8
Does the program
use strong financial management practices?
10%
Total
Section Score
Section
IV: Program Results
Questions
Ans.
Explanation
(Required)
Evidence/Data
(if available)
RMO Weighting
Weighted Score
1
Has the program
demonstrated adequate progress in achieving its long-term
outcome goal(s)?
20%
2
Does the program
(including program partners) achieve its annual performance
goals?
20%
3
Were program
goals achieved within budgeted costs and established schedules?
20%
4
Does the performance
of this program compare favorably to other programs with similar
purpose and goals?
20%
5
Do comprehensive,
independent, quality evaluations of this program indicate
that the program is effective and achieving results?
20%
Total
Section Score
The Performance Institute 1515 N. Courthouse
Road, Suite 600 Arlington, Va. 22201 703-894-0481
fax 703-894-0482 www.performanceweb.org
[email protected]