Anti-TOT groups organize funds, campaign staffs
Issue
begins to reflect broader tension in city politics
By
SCOTT LEWIS
City
Hall critic Carl DeMaio -- whose rhetorical battle with San Diego
city leaders has raged for months -- promised to put his money
where his mouth is and spend up to $100,000 of his own funds to
defeat a measure that would increase the city's hotel-room tax.
DeMaio heads the Performance Institute, a public interest consulting
firm, and two other companies: Performance Events, a meeting planner,
and the consulting firm American Strategic Management Institute,
which he said have a combined annual revenue of $10 million.
DeMaio said he would try to raise an additional $150,000 from
sympathetic donors to also fund a "voter education campaign"
to outline the policies of City Council, city attorney and mayoral
candidates.
The expenditure may be one of the largest single investments in
a campaign for or against one of the slew of local measures that
have a spot on November's ballot.
If he follows through on the promise, DeMaio's could be counted
as yet one more group funding efforts to squash the increase to
the city's transient occupancy tax, or TOT, that so far has not
inspired anyone to organize in its favor.
If approved, the ballot measure would boost the tax on visitors
staying in hotel rooms to 13 percent of their bill per night compared
to the 10.5 percent they pay now.
Almost
all of the preliminary opposition to the increase in San Diego's
has, until now, come from groups who might support it if it came
up at either a different time or in a different way.
DeMaio
said, however, he hoped to kill it not because it didn't set aside
money for tourism industry interests or because it potentially
conflicted with other measures on the ballot, but because of a
simple principle.
"It's
throwing good money after bad," he said.
DeMaio's
opposition to the TOT increase will combine with the efforts of
the San Diego Lodging Industry Association, or LIA, which has
formed the campaign group The Committee to Save Jobs. LIA has
hired the public relations firms Porter Novelli and CynKat Communications
to help defeat the measure. Both candidates for mayor -- incumbent
Dick Murphy and County Supervisor Ron Roberts -- oppose increasing
the tax, as does the San Diego County Hotel-Motel Association.
While
San Diego's politically influential firefighters union was expected
to endorse a ballot argument in favor of the tax increase -- which
was due Thursday -- nothing more than rhetoric was promoting it.
"There
really isn't any campaign in support of TOT at this point. In
terms of mounting a campaign, that decision hasn't been made yet,"
said Jennifer Tierney, the firefighters' independent political
consultant, who is also working on Murphy's re-election campaign.
In fact, though firefighters supported the last attempt to increase
TOT in March, it was LIA and hotel industry leaders who provided
most of the financial support -- up to $750,000 for the campaign.
The measure garnered more than 50 percent of the votes cast but
fell short of a two-thirds support threshold required by state
law to enact special taxes.
A recent court ruling gave city leaders the go-ahead to put another
measure on the ballot that would only require it to receive support
from a simple majority -- 50 percent plus one -- to enact the
law.
The City Council voted 6-3 in favor of placing the measure on
the ballot -- with the mayor and Councilmen Brian Maienschein
and Jim Madaffer opposed. The mayor's office confirmed that, while
he is still opposed to the measure, he has no plans to campaign
against it.
"We are still counting on his opposition," said Mike
McDowell, LIA's executive vice president.
The mayor's opposition to the measure would seemingly come in
conflict with the support for it advanced by not only other members
of the City Council, but City Manager P. Lamont Ewell as well.
Ewell said the city needs additional revenue to cover public safety
equipment needs, such as firefighting equipment, and to make up
for some of the stress placed on the budget by agreements to fully
fund the pension system.
Bringing in new revenues would help the city with its credit rating
as well, Ewell said. The TOT tax increase would bring in an estimated
$28 million extra each year.
"It would certainly assist us in demonstrating to the rating
agencies that we were looking for new revenue options," Ewell
said.
Top on the list of priorities to which the council could direct
new revenues from the tax increase would be an aging communications
system used by the city's police and fire departments that officials
say is obsolete and on the verge of failing completely.
"There just isn't enough room to purchase these items and
also meet the daily needs of the city. So, consequently, we have
had to defer a number of those needs," Ewell said.
He said he was "disappointed" with tourist industry
groups who were beginning to organize against the measure.
"I differ with them on the issue of whether this would have
an negative impact on tourism," Ewell said.
He did not respond to DeMaio's charges, however, that the city
was wasting money it already had.
"We want to stop the hemorrhaging," DeMaio said. "When
you defeat TOT, you really do force reform and force them to look
at what they're spending money on."
DeMaio said one of the reasons for setting up his campaign committee,
San Diego Citizens for Accountable Government, was to let people
see where his money was coming from. He said a press conference
was being organized for September to announce his group's positions
on other ballot measures as well.
|